In this short post
I want to talk about a topic of which I have spoken with some friends in search
for a broader debate with different opinions. The subject is about the target
zones in Viking reenactment combat, and more specific, about the use of the
upper arms as a valid target for swords and axes, and the thighs for the
spears.
In some of the
most famous Viking reenactment festivals, such as Trelleborg and Moesgaard, and
inside many groups, when they are fighting in Western Style, the target areas
are the torso and the thighs. You can make cuts with swords and hits with the
axes in any part of this area, but the thrusts (with any weapon) are only
allowed in the torso (from crotch height).
Valid target area in traditional Western style fighting |
Personally, and
not matter how much I have asked, I cannot understand the reasons for not using
the upper arms as a valid target area. In my opinion, this makes the combat
less realistic, especially considering that in one handed weapon and shield
combat this was one of the most attacked parts of the body, according to the
archeological evidence from the Middle Ages (see here).
Besides this, I
think that it also makes the fights more dangerous because the hits are (necessarily)
closer to the face. I understand that stabs cannot be allowed in these parts because
they could cause serious muscle damage, but I do not see a real good reason for
not counting the hits and cuts with swords and axes. Usually, some people say
that fighting without upper arms makes you more accurate, but I think that you
can be accurate even fighting with these targets. Practicing without counting
these zones can be a good training exercise in order to put some stress on the combatant
and work on focus hits, but in festivals, especially in those that involve
hundreds of warriors fighting at the same, it does not only make it less realistic,
but more dangerous because, in addition to the adrenaline that goes up, it is
an impossible task for the organizers to check that every participant have the
right training for hitting the opponents in the shoulders without risk.
In regards of the
valid zones to hit with the spears, I cannot understand either why the thighs
are not a target area. My opinion is based in the same reasons that were
exposed before, specially the one that says that it is a much less realistic
fight. I do not know why you can stab someone in the ribs or the pelvis but not
in the thighs, a place with much more resistance than those.
This short text is
written with the intention of creating a debate to improve the fighting in Viking
reenactment groups and festivals, considering both safety and realism at the
same time.
I've recently decided the primary purpose of western target zones is to train for public exhibition events; primarily without the aid of protective equipment.
ResponderEliminarI believe it was much later that ideas such as Huscarl were introduced to simulate actual dueling, but the equipment takes away from the realism of the era.
I agree with what is written. However, in some events in Austria and Germany, the rules have been changed by introducing cuts to the legs and toes (spears included) to the legs. https://www.google.it/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=10&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwitgKXkrs3VAhWGmBoKHY62B4UQFghLMAk&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.medialev.de%2Fhikg%2Fhikg%2Fstarttexthikg-en.htm&usg=AFQjCNF61yEo4XdoE0iBoLO1BVueNPkExw
ResponderEliminar